4.4 Article

Taking emigration seriously: a new agenda for research on free movement and welfare

Journal

JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 930-942

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2020.1768280

Keywords

freedom of movement; European Union; immigration; emigration; welfare state; centre - periphery

Funding

  1. Fordernetzwerk Interdisziplinare Sozialpolitikforschung/German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article argues that emigration should be integrated into the research agenda of free movement of persons (FoM) and welfare states to better understand the relationship between FoM and welfare policy and politics, and how FoM affects national welfare boundaries. It points out the limitations of focusing exclusively on entry in studying FoM and proposes specific ideas for including emigration in broader research.
Free movement of persons (FoM) is a key topic in current research on European integration's effects on social justice and national welfare states. These debates have focused almost exclusively on FoM as the right to entry, and neglected the correlative right to exit. As a consequence, mainstream political science and public policy research has paid very little attention to welfare state-related implications of extensive emigration in several EU member states. This article argues that emigration should be incorporated into the FoM and welfare states research agenda, so as to better comprehend the relationship between FoM and welfare policy and politics, and to advance our understanding of how FoM alters national welfare boundaries. It discusses some of the conceptual limitations resulting from studying FoM exclusively in terms of entry, and advances more specific proposals for including emigration into the wider research agenda.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available