4.1 Article

Analysis of Journalism and Communication Studies in Europe's Top Ranked Universities: Competencies, Aims and Courses

Journal

JOURNALISM PRACTICE
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 1033-1053

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2020.1762505

Keywords

Communication; journalism; competencies; university; education; curriculum; technologies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the curricula of the top 8 universities in Europe in the field of Communication and Journalism, finding that these programs mainly focus on theoretical courses and research methodologies, with a lack of professionalization and technology learning.
This article presents the results of a descriptive study that analyzes 17 curricula in Communication and Journalism of the 8 best ranked universities in Europe in the field of Communication, according to theQS World University Rankings. The research, using both quantitative and qualitative methodology, analyzes the academic curricula focusing on 687 courses, studying the type of courses, credit and subjects and their distribution in the curriculum. Good practices are identified, and trends are indicated in the design of the curricula. Moreover, a content analysis of the curricula of the selected Degrees has been carried out, based on a series of indicators: structure and credit system, objectives of the studies, competencies and professional profiles. The study shows that Journalism and Communication Degrees of the best ranked universities in Europe tend to focus mainly on theoretical courses, research methodologies and optional courses, and to encourage a critical look rather than focusing on an education model based on the professionalization and in the learning of tools and technologies. We conclude that the educational programs of the analyzed universities are not ready to adapt to the important structural changes that communication and the profession have undergone in recent years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available