The Desirability of CSR Communication versus Greenhushing in the Hospitality Industry: The Customers' Perspective

Recent literature describes greenhushing as the deliberate managerial undercommunicating of corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts for fear of negative customer opinions and responses. Based on social psychological theory of tourism motivation and cognitive dissonance theory, this research tries to seek evidence that justifies such a practice from the customers' perspective. In study 1, focus groups reveal that hotels' CSR communication and awareness creation for environmental issues are desired by consumers. In study 2, an online experiment uncovers that one-way and particularly two-way CSR communication lead to more favorable attitudes toward hotels' CSR communication and lower intentions to behave unethically, compared with greenhushing. Perceived consumer effectiveness mediates the relationship between type of CSR communication and attitudes toward hotels' CSR communication as well as intentions to behave unethically. Pro-environmental identity moderates the relationship. Taken together, our research provides little justification for greenhushing in a hospitality context from the customers' perspective.

Automated summary

Recent research suggests that customers prefer hotels to communicate their CSR efforts and increase awareness of environmental issues. One-way and especially two-way CSR communication lead to more positive attitudes and reduced intentions for unethical behavior compared to greenhushing. Perceived consumer effectiveness mediates the relationship between type of CSR communication and attitudes, with pro-environmental identity moderating the relationship.