3.8 Article

Fifteen years of international journal of productivity and performance management (2004-2018)

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-11-2019-0530

Keywords

Performance measurement; Performance management; Bibliometrics; Bibliographic coupling; Bibliometric review; Bibliometric analysis; VOSviewer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that most authors of the International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (IJPPM) are from the UK and India, and the journal is performing well in terms of total citations and CiteScores. The main themes published in the journal include performance management, productivity, six sigma, lean, and supply chain management.
Purpose International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (IJPPM) is one of the prominent journals publishing on general management with a particular focus on performance management and productive sciences. The objective of this study is to provide an academic structure overview of the journal between 2004 and 2018 using bibliometric tools. Design/methodology/approach Data used for this study were extracted using the Scopus database. Bibliometric analysis using several bibliometric indicators are adopted to know the major trends and themes of the journal. Mapping of bibliographic data is carried using VOSviewer and Gephi software. Findings Authors: Most of the IJPPM contributors are affiliated to the UK and India. Journal Performance: It is gaining pre-eminence in terms of total citations as well as CiteScores. Main themes: Major themes published in the journal are performance management, productivity, six sigma, lean and supply chain management. Originality/value IJPPM's growing influence in the scientific community has generated the interest to analyse the journal's publication and growth pattern. Moreover, no such retrospective bibliometric study for IJPPM is conducted so far.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available