4.4 Article

Meditation and the Wandering Mind: A Theoretical Framework of Underlying Neurocognitive Mechanisms

Journal

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 39-66

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1745691620917340

Keywords

meditation; spontaneous thought; mind wandering; neural networks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During meditation, mind wandering is common and offers a unique opportunity to examine the nature of wandering thoughts by cultivating awareness and compassion. The theoretical framework emphasizes the role of meta-awareness, the effects of meditation on cognitive processes, and the influence on neural substrates underlying perception.
During the practice of meditation, the tendency of the mind to wander away from the object of focus is ubiquitous. The occurrence of mind wandering in the context of meditation provides individuals a unique and intimate opportunity to closely examine the nature of the wandering mind by cultivating an awareness of ongoing thought patterns, while simultaneously aiming to cultivate equanimity (evenness of temper or disposition) and compassion toward the content of thoughts, interpretations, and bodily sensations. In this article we provide a theoretical framework that highlights the neurocognitive mechanisms by which contemplative practices influence the neural and phenomenological processes underlying spontaneous thought. Our theoretical model focuses on several converging mechanisms: the role of meta-awareness in facilitating an increased moment-to-moment awareness of spontaneous thought processes, the effects of meditation practice on key structures underlying both the top-down cognitive processes and bottom-up sensory processes implicated in attention and emotion regulation, and the influence of contemplative practice on the neural substrates underlying perception and perceptual decoupling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available