4.3 Article

Run by others: school autonomy in Shanghai's entrustment management reform

Journal

ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 594-608

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1772198

Keywords

Shanghai; school autonomy; school-to-school collaboration; school management; entrustment management reform

Funding

  1. China Post-doctoral Research Fund [14101-412126-17009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article examines the Shanghai experience of entrustment management reform, finding that the reform has reconstructed school leadership structure and decreased the autonomy of 'weak' schools, although the overall process has proceeded smoothly.
The promotion of school-to-school collaboration and school autonomy has popularized in the global trends of school system reform over the past few decades. This article examines the Shanghai experience by specifically taking the entrustment management reform as an illustrative example. Since 2007, the government has contracted 'good' schools in urban districts and private non-profit educational organizations to manage a group of relatively 'weak' schools in rural districts. Three 'weak' schools and their entrusted bodies were investigated in this study to elaborate the nature and structure of school autonomy in the new hierarchical management system. This article argues that rather than leading to substantial redistribution of the autonomy between the government and the school as stated, the reform has reconstructed the school leadership. A kind of 'one-side-collaboration' has emerged in 'weak' schools' decision-making processes, which has in effect decreased their autonomy. Nevertheless, the reform has generally proceeded smoothly. This can be articulated through understanding Confucian moral and interrelated autonomy, in contrast to the Western autonomy premised on egoism and rationality and emphasizing the self-other tension, and in China's political and bureaucratic contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available