4.4 Article

Adaptive and Dark Personality in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Predicting Health-Behavior Endorsement and the Appeal of Public-Health Messages

Journal

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 697-707

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1948550620936439

Keywords

communication; health; individual differences; personality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research suggests that individuals' personality traits are relevant to epidemiology and public-health communication in a contagious-disease context. Normal-range traits, especially agreeableness and conscientiousness, are associated with endorsement of social distancing, hygiene practices, and the appeal of health messages. On the other hand, dark traits predict lower endorsement of health behaviors.
Who embraces directions to socially distance, boost hygiene, and protect others during a pandemic of contagious respiratory disease? Do differently phrased public-health messages appeal to different people? I based predictions on the five-factor, triarchic psychopathy, and Dark Triad models of normal-range and dark traits; the extended parallel process model (EPPM); and schema-congruence theory. In a survey of 502 online participants, normal-range traits (esp agreeableness and conscientiousness) predicted endorsement of social distancing and hygiene, as well as the appeal of health messages in general. Consistent with the EPPM, conscientiousness and neuroticism had an interaction. Dark traits (esp psychopathy, meanness, and disinhibition) predicted low endorsement of health behaviors and the intent to knowingly expose others to risk. Most participants preferred a message appealing to compassion (Help protect the vulnerable horizontal ellipsis ), but dark traits predicted lower appeal of that message. Personality appears relevant to epidemiology and public-health communication in a contagious-disease context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available