4.6 Article

Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 435-443

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.119

Keywords

copy number variation; next-generation sequencing; noncoding; diagnostics; whole-genome sequencing

Funding

  1. Centre for Genetic Medicine
  2. Centre for Applied Genomics
  3. Hospital for Sick Children
  4. University of Toronto McLaughlin Centre
  5. CREMS Research Scholarship from the Faculty of Medicine
  6. McLaughlin Centre at the University of Toronto
  7. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) GlaxoSmithKline Endowed Chair in Genome Sciences at The Hospital for Sick Children
  8. University of Toronto
  9. Genome Canada
  10. Women's Auxiliary Chair in Clinical and Metabolic Genetics at The Hospital for Sick Children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Genetic testing is an integral diagnostic component of pediatric medicine. Standard of care is often a time-consuming stepwise approach involving chromosomal microarray analysis and targeted gene sequencing panels, which can be costly and inconclusive. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a comprehensive testing platform that has the potential to streamline genetic assessments, but there are limited comparative data to guide its clinical use.& para;& para;Methods: We prospectively recruited 103 patients from pediatric non-genetic subspecialty clinics, each with a clinical phenotype suggestive of an underlying genetic disorder, and compared the diagnostic yield and coverage of WGS with those of conventional genetic testing.& para;& para;Results: WGS identified diagnostic variants in 41% of individuals, representing a significant increase over conventional testing results (24%; P = 0.01). Genes clinically sequenced in the cohort (n = 1,226) were well covered by WGS, with a median exonic coverage of 40 x +/- 8 x (mean +/- SD). All the molecular diagnoses made by conventional methods were captured by WGS. The 18 new diagnoses made with WGS included structural and non-exonic sequence variants not detectable with whole-exome sequencing, and confirmed recent disease associations with the genes PIGG, RNU4ATAC, TRIO, and UNC13A.& para;& para;Conclusion: WGS as a primary clinical test provided a higher diagnostic yield than conventional genetic testing in a clinically heterogeneous cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available