4.6 Article

A familial study of azoospermic men identifies three novel causative mutations in three new human azoospermia genes

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 998-1006

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.225

Keywords

azoospermia; crossover; meiosis; rapid prophase movements; whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing

Funding

  1. Weizmann Institute of Science Kekst Family Center for Medical Genetics
  2. David and Fela Shapell Family Center for Genetic Disorders Research
  3. Crown Human Genome Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Up to 1% of all men experience azoospermia, a condition of complete absence of sperm in the semen. The mechanisms and genes involved in spermatogenesis are mainly studied in model organisms, and their relevance to humans is unclear because human genetic studies are very scarce. Our objective was to uncover novel human mutations and genes causing azoospermia due to testicular meiotic maturation arrest. Methods: Affected and unaffected siblings from three families were subjected to whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, followed by comprehensive bioinformatics analyses to identify mutations suspected to cause azoospermia. These likely mutations were further screened in azoospermic and normozoospermic men and in men proven to be fertile, as well as in a reference database of local populations. Results: We identified three novel likely causative mutations of azoospermia in three genes: MEIOB, TEX14, and DNAH6. These genes are associated with different meiotic processes: meiotic crossovers, daughter cell abscission, and possibly rapid prophase movements. Conclusion: The genes and pathways we identified are fundamental for delineating common causes of azoospermia originating in mutations affecting diverse meiotic processes and have great potential for accelerating approaches to diagnose, treat, and prevent infertility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available