Journal
GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1105-1117Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.37
Keywords
ACMG laboratory guideline; clinical genetic testing; clinical interpretation; variant classification; variant interpretation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines were a major step toward establishing a common framework for variant classification. In practice, however, several aspects of the guidelines lack specificity, are subject to varied interpretations, or fail to capture relevant aspects of clinical molecular genetics. A simple implementation of the guidelines in their current form is insufficient for consistent and comprehensive variant classification. Methods: We undertook an iterative process of refining the ACMG-AMP guidelines. We used the guidelines to classify more than 40,000 clinically observed variants, assessed the outcome, and refined the classification criteria to capture exceptions and edge cases. During this process, the criteria evolved through eight major and minor revisions. Results: Our implementation: (i) separated ambiguous ACMG-AMP criteria into a set of discrete but related rules with refined weights; (ii) grouped certain criteria to protect against the overcounting of conceptually related evidence; and (iii) replaced the clinical criteria style of the guidelines with additive, semiquantitative criteria. Conclusion: Sherloc builds on the strong framework of 33 rules established by the ACMG-AMP guidelines and introduces 108 detailed refinements, which support a more consistent and transparent approach to variant classification.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available