4.6 Review

Vascular phenotypes in nonvascular subtypes of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a systematic review

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 562-573

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.138

Keywords

connective tissue disorder; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; nonvascular subtype; systematic review; vascular complication

Funding

  1. Methusalem grant from Ghent University [08/01M01108]
  2. Fund for Scientific Research (FWO), Belgium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Within the spectrum of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), vascular complications are usually associated with the vascular subtype of EDS. Vascular complications are also observed in other EDS subtypes, but the reports are anecdotal and the information is dispersed. To better document the nature of vascular complications among nonvascular EDS subtypes, we performed a systematic review. Methods: We queried three databases for English-language studies from inception until May 2017, documenting both phenotypes and genotypes of patients with nonvascular EDS subtypes. The outcome included the number and nature of vascular complications. Results: A total of 112 papers were included and data were collected from 467 patients, of whom 77 presented with a vascular phenotype. Severe complications included mainly hematomas (53%), frequently reported in musculocontractural and classical-like EDS; intracranial hemorrhages (18%), with a high risk in dermatosparaxis EDS; and arterial dissections (16%), frequently reported in kyphoscoliotic and classical EDS. Other, more minor, vascular complications were reported in cardiac-valvular, arthrochalasia, spondylodysplastic, and periodontal EDS. Conclusion: Potentially life-threatening vascular complications are a rare but important finding in several nonvascular EDS subtypes, highlighting a need for more systematic documentation. This review will help familiarize clinicians with the spectrum of vascular complications in EDS and guide follow-up and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available