4.6 Article

A C-terminal nonsense mutation links PTPRQ with autosomal-dominant hearing loss, DFNA73

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 614-621

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.155

Keywords

autosomal-dominant hearing loss; deafness; DFNB84A; nonsense mutation; PTPRQ

Funding

  1. GEERS-Stiftung

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Hearing loss is genetically extremely heterogeneous, making it suitable for next-generation sequencing (NGS). We identified a four-generation family with nonsyndromic mild to severe hearing loss of the mid-to high frequencies and onset from early childhood to second decade in seven members. Methods: NGS of 66 deafness genes, Sanger sequencing, genome-wide linkage analysis, whole-exome sequencing (WES), semiquantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Results: We identified a heterozygous nonsense mutation, c.6881G> A (p.Trp2294*), in the last coding exon of PTPRQ. PTPRQ has been linked with recessive (DFNB84A), but not dominant deafness. NGS and Sanger sequencing of all exons (including alternatively spliced 5' and N-scan-predicted exons of a putative extended transcript) did not identify a second mutation. The highest logarithm of the odds score was in the PTPRQ-containing region on chromosome 12, and p.Trp2294* cosegregated with hearing loss. WES did not identify other cosegregating candidate variants from the mapped region. PTPRQ expression in patient fibroblasts indicated that the mutant allele escapes nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Conclusion: Known PTPRQ mutations are recessive and do not affect the C-terminal exon. In contrast to recessive loss-of-function mutations, c.6881G> A transcripts may escape NMD. PTPRQ(Trp2294*) protein would lack only six terminal residues and could exert a dominant-negative effect, a possible explanation for allelic deafness, DFNA73, clinically and genetically distinct from DFNB84A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available