4.2 Article

Improving the Measurement of Functional Somatic Symptoms With Item Response Theory

Journal

ASSESSMENT
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 1960-1970

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1073191120947153

Keywords

functional somatic symptoms; item response theory; graded response model; SCL-90; medically unexplained symptoms

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research NWO [175.010.2007.006]
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  4. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Sports
  5. Northern Netherlands Collaboration of Provinces (SNN)
  6. Province of Groningen
  7. University Medical Center Groningen
  8. University of Groningen
  9. Dutch Kidney Foundation
  10. Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through item response theory analysis, it was found that two items of the somatization scale of the Symptom Checklist-90 were the most discriminative and informative for measuring different severity levels of functional somatic symptoms.
More than 40 questionnaires have been developed to assess functional somatic symptoms (FSS), but there are several methodological issues regarding the measurement of FSS. We aimed to identify which items of the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) are more informative and discriminative between persons at different levels of severity of FSS. To this end, item response theory was applied to the somatization scale of the SCL-90, collected from a sample of 82,740 adult participants without somatic conditions in the Lifelines Cohort Study. Sensitivity analyses were performed with all the participants who completed the somatization scale. Both analyses showed that Items 11 feeling weak physically and 12 heavy feelings in arms or legs were the most discriminative and informative to measure severity levels of FSS, regardless of somatic conditions. Clinicians and researchers may pay extra attention to these symptoms to augment the assessment of FSS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available