4.1 Article

EMPHASISING AN EMBODIED PHENOMENOLOGICAL SENSE OF THE SELF AND THE SOCIAL IN EDUCATION

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages 365-380

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2020.1796923

Keywords

phenomenology; Merleau-Ponty; embodiment; intersubjectivity; education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the theoretical foundations of phenomenology and argues for the integration of the self and social aspects in education. By examining foundational phenomenologists and reciprocal connections in human action, it presents the ontological possibilities for a more central role of self and social phenomenology in educational aims.
This paper reviews the theoretical underpinnings of phenomenology-related writings which support claims that the self and the social (the 'I' and the 'We') can plausibly be integrated and nurtured together in education. We begin by analysing contemporary theorising which suggests that reviewing foundational phenomenologists, particularly Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, can lead to greater clarity in understanding and appreciating the intersubjective sense of the self and the social. This perspective is aided by reviewing the reciprocal connections which take place during human action, situational structuring, and reality construction. Building on this review we consider some of the ontological possibilities for a self and social phenomenology to become more central to educational aims. In doing so, we raise rather than unpack in exhaustive detail associated methodological matters in light of their educational implications. If successfully enacted, we perceive considerable benefits for students in being able to directly attend to the properties of their experiences, especially in contexts where new habits are formed and where opportunities arise for self and shared experiences to be reviewed and reflected on by all involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available