4.5 Article

FANCat: French affective norms for ten emotional categories

Journal

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 447-465

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01450-z

Keywords

Affective norms; Discrete emotion categories; Positive and negative emotions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops key research on French word norms and provides the FANCat database, including affective norms for 1031 French words. The results showed high inter-rater reliability and good external validity, contributing to a deeper understanding of the relationship between language and negative and positive emotions.
The present study develops key research for French word norms that combines the predominant theories of dimensional and discrete (or categorical) emotions. As a result, we provide the database FANCat, affective norms for a set of 1031 French words on ten discrete emotion categories: fear, anger, disgust, sadness, anxiety, awe, excitement, contentment, amusement, and serenity. FANCat complements a previous word set, FAN, which provides only the dimensional norms, valence, and arousal (Monnier & Syssau,2014). Herein, we introduce five discrete positive emotions in efforts to differentiate positive emotions at higher resolution and specificity. Although ten emotional categories were considered in FANCat norms, results showed a high degree of inter-rater reliability and a good external validity. Then, distributional analyses of words into the ten emotion categories revealed that positive words evoked mainly the emotions awe, contentment, and amusement, and principally evoked either one positive emotion only (pure words) or two (mixed words). This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between language, and negative and positive emotions. It is also currently the only norms database in French that analyses ten discrete emotions as well as including valence and arousal. FANCat is available at.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available