4.5 Article

Passion in University: The Role of the Dualistic Model of Passion in Explaining Students' Academic Functioning

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 2031-2050

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-020-00304-x

Keywords

University students; Passion; Psychological health; Academic functioning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the impact of students' passion for studying on their academic functioning, identifying four passion profiles in a sample of 460 university students: High, Moderate, Low, and Optimal. Highly passionate students demonstrated the most positive academic functioning, while students in the Low profile showed the worst levels of academic functioning. Implications for research and intervention on academic passion were discussed.
The dualistic model of passion proposes that harmonious and obsessive passions play distinct roles in predicting individuals' functioning. Few research projects explored the contribution of passion for one's studies and none to our knowledge used a person-centered approach. This study aimed to identify passion profiles toward one's studies and to compare students' academic functioning (burnout, engagement, satisfaction, dropout intentions, and achievement) as a function of their passion profile. Results of latent profile analysis demonstrated the presence of four profiles:High(high harmonious and obsessive passions),Moderate(moderate harmonious and obsessive passions),Low(low harmonious and obsessive passions), andOptimal(high harmonious passion and low obsessive passion) in a sample of 460 university students. Overall, highly passionate students (HighandOptimalprofiles) reported the most positive indices of academic functioning while students in theLowprofile evidenced the worst levels of academic functioning. Implications of research and intervention on academic passion are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available