4.3 Article

Paradigm shift in Danish wind power: the (un)sustainable transformation of a sector

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 97-113

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1799769

Keywords

Danish wind power; socio-technical agencement; paradigm shift; social acceptance; conceptual model

Funding

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research [1305-00021B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the origin and transformation of the Danish wind power sector, focusing on the changing roles of electricity producers. By tracking the transformation through five dimensions, the shift from distributed power source to critical infrastructure has marginalized local players and mobilized new types of producers and ownership forms.
The Danish wind power sector grew out of a combination of small and medium-sized entrepreneurial firms and local pioneers forming small-scale wind farm cooperatives. This paper studies the initial organisation and subsequent transformation of the socio-technical assemblage or 'agencement' around wind power in Denmark, focusing on the changing roles and agency of electricity producers. We propose a conceptual model for mapping the transformation over time, following five entangled dimensions: capitalisation instruments, turbine technology, capital investment, regulation of finance and ownership modes. We show how changes in all five socio-material dimensions have produced a 'paradigm shift', reconfiguring wind power from a distributed power source to critical infrastructure. This shift has marginalised local players and mobilised new types of producers and ownership forms. Using the conceptual model, we map the controversy resulting from the paradigm shift. Our relational lens of market studies within Science & Technology Studies captures how wind power's 'sustainability' has become contested, and how this cannot be understood as a matter of 'community acceptance' dissociated from material factors. Proposing our conceptual model for future studies, we contribute not only to the extant social acceptance literature, but also to critical energy debates on the governance of climate change and sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available