4.2 Article

Competing institutional logics of academic personnel system reforms in leading Chinese Universities

Journal

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2020.1747958

Keywords

Institutional logics; new managerialism; tenure-track reform; world-class universities; Chinese higher education

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Utilizing an institutional logic perspective, this study examines the dynamics and complexity of academic personnel system reforms at leading Chinese universities. The research reveals that the fundamental goal of these reforms is to address increasing global competition and stimulate research outputs within a new managerial context, resulting in the emergence of a unique 'two-tier' career system.
This study utilises an institutional logic perspective to explore the dynamics and complexity of academic personnel system reforms at leading Chinese universities. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 participants from 10 highly ranked universities; these interviews obtained the views of key observers on four main reform initiatives: global recruitment, the adoption of a tenure-track system and improvements to performance criteria and review procedures. Findings reveal that the fundamental goal of academic personnel system reforms for leading Chinese research universities was to address increasing global competition and stimulate research outputs within a new managerial context. A unique 'two-tier' career system is emerging influenced by the interweaving of competing logics and complicated interactions between external influences and Chinese traditions, in which the traditional permanent employment system operates simultaneously with the newly introduced tenure-track system, and 'up-or-out' has transformed into 'up-or-transfer' due to the legacies of thedanweisystem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available