4.4 Article

Reflecting on nostalgic, positive, and novel experiences increases state Openness

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 258-275

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12580

Keywords

intervention; nostalgia; novelty; Openness; personality change

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reflecting on nostalgic, positive, and novel experiences can increase state Openness. State positive affect and self-esteem are important predictors of Openness, suggesting possible indirect paths. This finding may be helpful for interventions targeting trait-level change.
Objective Personality change is a growing field of interest, but relatively few studies have examined causes of change in Openness. We investigated whether it is possible to influence state Openness, and through what mechanisms this effect may occur. Method In two experiments (Study 1:N = 144,M-age = 36.4, 58% female, 88% White; Study 2:N = 269,M-age = 34.0, 60% female, 91% White), participants reflected on and wrote about a personal experience requested to be either: nostalgic; positive and novel (Study 1); positive or novel (Study 2); or ordinary. They rated the events for nostalgia, positivity, novelty, and sociality, and completed measures of state positive affect, self-esteem, social connectedness, meaning in life, and state Openness. Results Participants who recalled positive and/or novel events reported greater state Openness than those who recalled ordinary events. In Study 1, this also applied to those recalling nostalgic events. Event ratings of positivity (both studies), nostalgia and novelty (Study 2) independently predicted state Openness. State positive affect and self-esteem were independent predictors in both studies, suggesting possible indirect paths. Conclusions Reflecting on nostalgic, positive, and novel experiences can increase state Openness. This finding may be useful for interventions targeting trait-level change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available