4.3 Article

Gay-Straight Alliances, School Functioning, and Mental Health: Associations for Students of Color and LGBTQ Students

Journal

YOUTH & SOCIETY
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages 211-229

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0044118X20951045

Keywords

Gay-Straight Alliance; race; ethnicity; LGBTQ

Funding

  1. Population Research Center by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P2CHD042849]
  2. Communities for Just Schools Fund
  3. Priscilla Pond Flawn Endowment at the University of Texas at Austin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research found that students in schools with GSAs had better school functioning, lower substance use, and better mental health. The association between GSA presence and mental health and substance use was not as strong for students of color as it was for non-Hispanic white students. Additionally, LGBTQ students did not benefit as much in terms of school functioning from the presence of GSAs compared to non-LGBTQ students.
Utilizing a school-based sample of 895,218 students aged 10-18 years old, we examine differences in students' school functioning, substance use, and mental health in schools with and without Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs). In addition, we examine whether GSA presence is associated with these outcomes for students of color and LGBTQ students. Overall, students in schools with GSAs were found to report better school functioning, lower substance use, and better mental health. For students of color, the association between the presence of a GSA and mental health and substance use was not as strong as it was for non-Hispanic white students. Further, for LGBTQ students, the association between the presence of a GSA and school functioning was not as strong as it was for non-LGBTQ students. Future research is necessary to ascertain the function of GSAs, especially for marginalized youth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available