4.3 Article

HIV Care Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed-Methods Telephone Interviews with Clinic-Enrolled HIV-Infected Adults in Uganda

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 28-39

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-03032-8

Keywords

HIV; Adherence; Uganda; Antiretroviral treatment; ART; COVID-19; Pandemic; Mixed methods; Mobile phone; Survey

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH110350]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

COVID-19 measures negatively impacted access to HIV care and treatment for Ugandan adults on ART, leading to difficulties in visiting clinics, fear of contracting COVID-19, and decreased ART adherence. However, stay-at-home orders helped routinize ART adherence and new community-based approaches for HIV care are being implemented to address these challenges.
COVID-19 measures that restrict movement may negatively impact access to HIV care and treatment. To contribute to the currently limited evidence, we used telephone interviews with quantitative and qualitative questions to examine how clients perceived COVID-19 and its effect on their HIV care and ART adherence. One hundred (n = 100) Ugandan adults on ART from an existing study were randomly selected and enrolled. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and rapid content analyses. 76% of clients indicated that COVID-19 negatively impacted travel to HIV clinics; 54% perceived that coming to the clinic increased their risk of acquiring COVID-19; and 14% said that COVID-19 had negatively impacted their ART adherence. Qualitative feedback suggests that fear of COVID-19 infection discouraged clinic attendance while stay-at-home orders helped routinize ART adherence and employ new community-based approaches for HIV care. Addressing negative unintended consequences of COVID-19 lockdowns on HIV care is urgently needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available