4.4 Article

Exploring the role of companies in scientific research: a case study of genetically modified maize

Journal

TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 349-364

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1814237

Keywords

Industry R&D; company funding; bibliometric analysis; technology emergence indicators

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673024, 71874913]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technology plays a crucial role in the competitiveness of leading global companies. Collaborating with and funding research organizations are effective ways to enhance innovation performance. Big companies in the agrobiotechnology sector have actively driven the development of genetically modified techniques, as evidenced by the case study of genetically modified maize. Companies play important roles as authors and funders in scientific research, with a wide range of collaborations and international funding networks established.
Technology is a key factor for the competitiveness of the world-leading companies. Collaborating with and funding other research organisations are effective and economical ways to improve their innovation performance. This study aims to investigate the roles of companies in scientific research, as an author and as a funder, and the inner links. Big companies in the agrobiotechnology sector have made great efforts to drive the development of genetically modified techniques. Genetically modified maize, as one of the commercialised genetically modified organisms, is selected as the case study. From an investigation of data available from the Web of Science database, we find that companies' publications are important in terms of quality and quantity. Companies collaborate with various types of organisations, and build international funding networks. These publications involve in a wide range of emerging topics, and company-authored publications have higher citations. Implications for further research are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available