4.1 Article

WHEN DO SHELTER-IN-PLACE ORDERS FIGHT COVID-19 BEST? POLICY HETEROGENEITY ACROSS STATES AND ADOPTION TIME

Journal

ECONOMIC INQUIRY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 29-52

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12944

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Center for Health Economics & Policy Studies (CHEPS) at San Diego State University
  2. Charles Koch Foundation
  3. Troesh Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study finds that Shelter-in-Place Orders (SIPOs) led to increased social distancing levels and decreased COVID-19 cases, but there are significant differences in the effects across states.
This study explores the impact of Shelter-in-Place Orders (SIPOs) on health, with attention to heterogeneity in their impacts. First, using daily state-level social distancing data, we document that adoption of a SIPO was associated with a 9%-10% increase in the rate at which state residents remained in their homes full-time. Using daily state-level coronavirus case data, we find that approximately 3 weeks following the adoption of a SIPO, cumulative COVID-19 cases fell by approximately 53.5%. However, this average effect masks important heterogeneity across states-early adopters and high population density states appear to reap larger benefits from their SIPOs.(JELH75, I12, I18)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available