3.8 Article

Towards rangatiratanga in pest management? Maori perspectives and frameworks on novel biotechnologies in conservation

Journal

PACIFIC CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 391-401

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/PC20014

Keywords

consent; conservation tools; culture; environmental management; genetic modification; indigenous communities; invertebrates; New Zealand; Social License

Funding

  1. National Science Challenge: New Zealand's Biological Heritage theme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The New Zealand government aims to make the country predator-free by 2050 due to the threat introduced mammals pose to native birds. Research is exploring new technologies to achieve this, including controversial gene drive methods. Maori perspectives on genetic technologies emphasize autonomy and customary protocols, with a focus on consent processes based upon rangatiratanga. Recognition of rangatiratanga and tikanga could potentially transform conservation biology in New Zealand.
In Aotearoa New Zealand, the government has set a target for the country to become predator-free by 2050, largely as a response to the threat of extinction that introduced mammals pose to native birds. Current pest management tools lack the scalability required to reach pest eradication; thus, new technologies are being explored through public research funding, including controversial techniques such as gene drive. While the need to listen to Maori perspectives on genetic technologies is broadly recognised, the Treaty relationship between government and Maori demands more, including attention torangatiratanga(autonomy for Maori) andtikanga(Maori customary protocols). A 'social licence to operate' is argued to be key to getting public support for such technologies, but is that consistent with a Maori approach? To address this question, we gathered Maori perspectives on novel biotechnological controls for pest wasps through three distinct studies. Study participants included tertiary students, businesses, and spiritual or religiously affiliated groups. All participants drew from their identities as Maori people to help identify their position on these issues. Their perspectives on issues of consent and Social Licence suggest a preference for processes based uponrangatiratanga. Participant perspectives were also organised according to atake utu eadecision-making framework. This exercise suggests that this framework continues to be a relevant and useful contribution to how biotechnology discussions are framed.Rangatiratangaandtikangaare underlying considerations for Maori in relation to novel biotechnologies, and, if recognised more widely, have potential to transform conservation biology in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available