4.3 Article

Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies

Journal

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 20-33

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22086

Keywords

CpG; DNA methylation; epigenetic epidemiology; EWAS; FWER; GWAS; permutation; resampling; simulation extrapolation

Funding

  1. Fondazione Banco di Sardegna
  2. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna [7]
  3. MRC [MR/K006215/1]
  4. MRC [MC_UU_00026/3, MR/K006215/1, MC_PC_MR/R020183/1, MC_EX_MR/M01424X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K006215/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) are designed to characterise population-level epigenetic differences across the genome and link them to disease. Most commonly, they assess DNA-methylation status at cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) sites, using platforms such as the Illumina 450k array that profile a subset of CpGs genome wide. An important challenge in the context of EWAS is determining a significance threshold for declaring a CpG site as differentially methylated, taking multiple testing into account. We used a permutation method to estimate a significance threshold specifically for the 450k array and a simulation extrapolation approach to estimate a genome-wide threshold. These methods were applied to five different EWAS datasets derived from a variety of populations and tissue types. We obtained an estimate of =2.4x10-7 for the 450k array, and a genome-wide estimate of =3.6x10-8. We further demonstrate the importance of these results by showing that previously recommended sample sizes for EWAS should be adjusted upwards, requiring samples between approximate to 10% and approximate to 20% larger in order to maintain type-1 errors at the desired level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available