4.4 Article

An approach to the travel and tourism competitiveness index in the Caribbean region

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 346-362

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jtr.2411

Keywords

Caribbean region; composite index; data envelopment analysis; destination competitiveness; goal programming; travel and tourism competitiveness index

Funding

  1. Agencia de Innovacion y Desarrollo de Andalucia [P18-RT-1566, UMA18-FEDERJA-065]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2019-104263RB-C42]
  3. Pablo de Olavide University, Research Group Quantitative Methods in Business and Economics [SEJ332]
  4. Universidad de Pinar del Rio [PI-195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes an index for measuring tourism destination competitiveness in the Caribbean Region to address the absence of Caribbean destinations in international rankings. Utilizing Goal Programming and Data Envelopment Analysis, the study establishes four dimensional rankings and a global rank as useful tools for policymakers. The results demonstrate the proposal's explanatory power and methodological improvements in building composite indicators for measuring destination competitiveness.
This study aims to propose an index for measuring tourism destination competitiveness in the Caribbean Region. The application purpose is to fill the absence of Caribbean destinations in international rankings. Thirty three destinations and 27 indicators were considered, grouped into the 4 sub-indexes of the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index. The application was based on Goal Programming and Data Envelopment Analysis. Four dimensional rankings and a global rank were established as a useful tool for policy makers. The results demonstrate the proposal's explanatory power and methodological improvements in building composite indicators to measure the competitiveness of destinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available