3.8 Article

Understanding social innovation processes in rural areas: empirical evidence from social enterprises in Germany

Journal

SOCIAL ENTERPRISE JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 220-239

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/SEJ-12-2019-0093

Keywords

Governance; Rural development; Collective action; Cooperatives; Innovation research; Public good provision

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany within the framework of Broadening Horizons, Changing Perspectives [01IO1707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to contribute towards better understanding of rural innovation processes related to provision of public goods by examining social innovation processes, particularly focusing on community cooperatives in rural areas of Germany. The findings highlight the importance of social innovation governance framework and the differences in actor constellations and resource-allocation patterns in social innovations.
Purpose Against the background of increasing infrastructure loss in many rural areas, this study aims to contribute conceptually and empirically towards better understanding of rural innovation processes related to provision of public goods. Design/methodology/approach The nationally focused understanding of innovation processes leads the debate on rural development into a dilemma that this study seeks to sidestep via the concept of social innovation. Community cooperatives - a type of social enterprise that has increasingly emerged in rural areas of Germany in the past decade - offer the opportunity to examine social innovation processes. This cross-case study reveals the broad range of activities in which such cooperatives are active and analyses their social innovation processes. Findings The study shows that the social innovation governance framework enables examination of social innovation processes. Although macro-level policy has appeared to be an important instrument for financing social innovation, public actors at the micro-level seem barely able to initiate social innovation processes unless they are also private actors and, therefore, can pursue additional incentives. The social innovations studied here seem to differ in terms of their actor constellations and resource-allocation patterns, depending on whether they are concerned with the establishment or maintenance of local infrastructure. What they have in common, however, is the initiation of formalised collective-action processes that serve to legitimise social innovation. Originality/value By applying an analytical framework that is new to the literature on social innovation, the study provides insight into the activities and decision-making processes of actors involved in social innovation in rural areas. In this context, community cooperatives have rarely been studied as an interface between public, private and civil society actors or as a platform for mobilising human, social and financial capital.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available