4.5 Review

The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis

Journal

PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 813-826

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5

Keywords

Bayesian inference; Scientific reporting; Statistical software

Funding

  1. Vici grant from the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO) [016.Vici.170.083]
  2. ERC [743086 UNIFY]
  3. NWO [451-15-010, 451-17-017]
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1321846]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although there is a lack of practical guidelines on how to apply Bayesian procedures and interpret results in empirical research, this study offers specific guidance for four stages of Bayesian statistical reasoning in a research setting: planning the analysis, executing the analysis, interpreting the results, and reporting the results. Each stage's guidelines are illustrated with a running example, primarily focusing on analyses performed with the open-source statistical software JASP, but with applicability to Bayesian inference in general.
Despite the increasing popularity of Bayesian inference in empirical research, few practical guidelines provide detailed recommendations for how to apply Bayesian procedures and interpret the results. Here we offer specific guidelines for four different stages of Bayesian statistical reasoning in a research setting:planningthe analysis,executingthe analysis,interpretingthe results, andreportingthe results. The guidelines for each stage are illustrated with a running example. Although the guidelines are geared towards analyses performed with the open-source statistical software JASP, most guidelines extend to Bayesian inference in general.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available