4.6 Article

Understanding the Reaction Steps Involving Polysulfides in 1 M LiTFSI in TEGDME : DOL Using Cyclic Voltammetry Experiments and Modelling

Journal

BATTERIES & SUPERCAPS
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 152-162

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/batt.202000175

Keywords

polysulfides reaction steps; polysulfides intermediates; cyclic voltammetry; mathematical model; lithium-sulfur batteries

Funding

  1. European Union [314515]
  2. Institut Universtaire de France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the reaction steps of polysulfides in electrolyte solutions for Li-S batteries using experimental cyclic voltammetry and a mathematical model. The traditional reaction steps used in Li-S battery models were found to be insufficient to simulate all the characteristics of cyclic voltammograms in the investigated electrolyte solutions.
The reaction mechanisms of polysulfides in the electrolytes of lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries are known to be complex. These reaction mechanisms may also change with the electrolyte used. Understanding the reaction steps of the polysulfides in a Li-S battery electrolyte is important to assess the underlying phenomena behind the Li-S cell performance limitations. Here, we investigate the reaction steps of polysulfides in electrolyte solutions containing S-8, Li(2)S(8)and Li(2)S(6)in 1 M LiTFSI in TEGDME : DOL (v/v 1 : 1) (one of the most interesting electrolytes for use in Li-S batteries), using experimental cyclic voltammetry and a mathematical model. The mathematical model assists in understanding the reaction steps behind the characteristics changes of cyclic voltammograms (CVs) with the scan rate and polysulfides speciation. Our systematic study shows that the reaction steps conventionally used in Li-S battery models are not sufficient to simulate all the CV characteristics of the investigated electrolyte solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available