4.1 Article

Remote CBT for Psychosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities

Journal

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 30-34

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-020-00718-0

Keywords

Cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis; Serious mental illness; Telehealth; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID pandemic has led to a secondary mental health pandemic, with individuals with psychosis facing increased risks of poorer outcomes. To address the need for high-quality care for these patients, the HY-CBt-p approach is proposed, which can be delivered in fewer sessions, learned by various providers, and includes techniques to help patients alleviate symptoms. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, and comparative effectiveness of remote-delivered CBTp.
The COVID pandemic is now leading to the emergence of a secondary mental health pandemic. Clients with psychosis are at increased risk of poorer medium- and long-term psychosocial and clinical outcomes. In response to the pressing need to flexibly deliver high-quality care to individuals with psychosis, this brief report proposes high yield cognitive behavioral techniques for psychosis (HY-CBt-p) facilitated by task sharing and digital enhancements. HY-CBt-p is delivered over fewer sessions than formulation-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis (CBTp), can be learned by a range of providers, and includes techniques such as developing a normalizing explanation; techniques to reduce anxiety, depression, and insomnia, which perpetuate psychotic symptoms; self-monitoring; reality testing; and wellness planning. Previous research suggests that effect sizes will be lower than that of 16-session formulation-driven CBTp, but additional research is needed to test the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, and comparative effectiveness of different forms of remote-delivered CBTp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available