4.1 Article

Do shorter inter-stimulus intervals in the go/no-go task enable better assessment of response inhibition?

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Psychology, Clinical

Associations between self-reported impulsivity and a latent variable of impulsive action constructed from three laboratory tasks

Akira Hasegawa et al.

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY (2019)

Article Psychology, Mathematical

Optimal go/no-go ratios to maximize false alarms

Michael E. Young et al.

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2018)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

A Hierarchical Model of Inhibitory Control

Jeggan Tiego et al.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2018)

Article Behavioral Sciences

The Three Models of Emotional Intelligence and Performance in a Hot and Cool go/no-go Task in Undergraduate Students

Mar-A J. Gutierrez-Cobo et al.

FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE (2017)

Article Psychology, Social

Further evidence of the heterogeneous nature of impulsivity

Amy J. Caswell et al.

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES (2015)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice

Jessica Weafer et al.

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS (2014)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Response Inhibition and Psychopathology: A Meta-Analysis of Go/No-Go Task Performance

Leah Wright et al.

JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY (2014)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood

Inge-Marie Eigsti et al.

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2006)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations

JB Hittner et al.

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2003)