4.1 Article

Influencers and COVID-19: reviewing key issues in press coverage across Australia, China, Japan, and South Korea

Journal

MEDIA INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA
Volume 178, Issue 1, Pages 114-135

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1329878X20959838

Keywords

coronavirus; COVID-19; influencers; wanghong; press coverage; social media

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award [DE190100789]
  2. Australian Research Council [DE190100789] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The outbreak of COVID-19 led to a surge in media coverage across the Asia Pacific, with a specific focus on influencers. This cross-cultural study highlights the importance of considering local backstories and contexts when interpreting how local news ecologies parse the impacts of COVID-19 on influencers.
As COVID-19 broke out across the Asia Pacific from December 2019, media coverage on its impacts proliferated online. Among these discourses, coverage on influencers was prominent, likely as many of the issues arising from COVID-19 contingencies - such as digitalization, public messaging, and misinformation - are cornerstones of this digital economy. In response, this cross-cultural study draws on a corpus of Australian, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean online news articles published between January and May 2020, to understand how local news ecologies were parsing the impacts of COVID-19 on influencers. From the coding of 150 news articles guided by Grounded Theory, this article focuses on the impact of the pandemic on influencers, and influencers' engagements with and reactions to the pandemic. Our study of individual governments' past engagements with their influencer industries suggest that local backstories and contexts are crucial to decipher why news angles tend to pitch particular stories on influencers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available