4.3 Article

Not Just Doing Time: Distinct Typologies of Attitudes and Emotions among Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 1-2, Pages 21-34

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12465

Keywords

Delinquency; Just world; Legal attitudes; Person-centered

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adolescents' attitudes and beliefs are important frames of reference, particularly for youth in the juvenile justice system. Different profiles of attitudes and emotions were found to be associated with antisocial behavior. Historically marginalized populations of youth were less likely to have positive legal attitudes and emotions, highlighting a gap in understanding youths' experiences within the juvenile justice system.
Adolescents' views of the legal system, just world beliefs, and moral emotions are interrelated and form an important frame of reference, particularly for young people involved in the juvenile justice system. Yet past scholarship has generally treated these as independent indices of youths' experience. This study took a person-centered, latent profile approach to attitudes and beliefs among 136 male youth incarcerated within secure US juvenile facilities. Three heterogeneous profiles were found (negative attitudes/low emotion, moderate attitudes/mixed emotions, andpositive attitudes/positive emotion) which were differentially associated with antisocial behavior. Youth who belonged to historically marginalized populations had significantly lower odds of belonging to a protective profile characterized by positive legal attitudes, just world beliefs, and emotions (positive attitudes/positive emotion). Findings highlight our gaps in understanding young people's experiences with legal and judicial entities and illustrate significant heterogeneity in youth's frame of reference within the juvenile justice system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available