4.3 Article

High collocation of sand lance and protected top predators: Implications for conservation and management

Journal

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/csp2.274

Keywords

forage fish; great shearwaters; Gulf of Maine; humpback whales; seabirds; spatial overlap; Stellwagen Bank

Funding

  1. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management [M17PG0019]
  2. Volgenau Foundation
  3. Mudge Foundation
  4. NOAA Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary
  5. U.S. Geological Survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed a strong spatial overlap between humpback whales, great shearwaters, and sand lance, indicating a close relationship among the species. Identifying sand lance habitats can help predict areas where predators aggregate, informing species protection and management strategies.
Spatial relationships between predators and prey provide critical information for understanding and predicting climate-induced shifts in ecosystem dynamics and mitigating human impacts. We used Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary as a case study to investigate spatial overlap among sand lance (Ammodytes dubius), a key forage fish species, and two protected predators: humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) and great shearwaters (Ardenna gravis). We conducted 6 years (2013-2018) of standardized surveys and quantified spatial overlap using the global index of collocation. Results showed strong, consistent collocation among species across seasons and years, suggesting that humpback whales and great shearwater distributions are tightly linked to sand lance. We propose that identifying sand lance habitats may indicate areas where humpbacks and shearwaters aggregate and are particularly vulnerable to human activities. Understanding how sand lance influence predator distributions can inform species protection and sanctuary management under present and future scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available