Journal
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Volume 1488, Issue 1, Pages 44-55Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14524
Keywords
beauty; pleasure; neuroaesthetics; mate choice; decision making
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Beauty is commonly used to refer to positive evaluative appraisals that are uniquely human. It shares computational mechanisms with other forms of hedonic appraisal of sensory objects but is distinguished by specific conceptual expectations. To qualify as beautiful, an object must elicit especially high levels of pleasure and be matched to internal learned models of what counts as beautiful.
Beauty is commonly used to refer to positive evaluative appraisals that are uniquely human. Little is known, however, about what distinguishes beauty in terms of psychological function or neurobiological mechanisms. Our review describes recent empirical studies and synthesizes what behavioral, cognitive, and neuroscientific experiments have revealed about the nature of beauty. These findings suggest that beauty shares computational mechanisms with other forms of hedonic appraisal of sensory objects but is distinguished by specific conceptual expectations. Specifically, experiencing an object as pleasurable is a prerequisite for judging it to be beautiful; but to qualify as beautiful, an object must elicit especially high levels of pleasure and be matched to internal learned models of what counts as beautiful. We discuss how these empirical findings contradict several assumptions about beauty, including the notion that beauty is disinterested, and that it is specific to Homo sapiens.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available