4.5 Article

Exploring asymmetric relationship between Islamic banking development and economic growth in Pakistan: Fresh evidence from a non-linear ARDL approach

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 6168-6187

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2115

Keywords

asymmetric co‐ integration; economic growth; Islamic banking development; NARDL; Pakistan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found an asymmetric relationship between Islamic banking development and economic growth in Pakistan, with positive shocks having a significant positive association with economic growth in the long run, while only positive shocks had a significant positive relationship with economic growth in the short run. The interconnection between Islamic banking development and economic growth was asymmetric/non-linear in the long run, but symmetric/linear in the short run. Non-linear models provide more realistic results by capturing hidden asymmetries, helping policymakers make useful decisions.
Islamic banking has gleaned considerable attention recently owing to its quantum growth. This study examines the asymmetric association between Islamic banking development (IBD) and economic growth (EG) in Pakistan that spans 2007Q1 to 2017Q4. We apply the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model of Shin et al., (2014). Our findings confirm co-integration between IBD and EG in Pakistan. The positive (negative) shocks of IBD have significant positive (negative) association with EG in the long-run; however, only positive shocks have significant positive relationship with EG in the short run. We observe that the interconnection between IBD-EG is asymmetric/non-linear in the long-run, whereas symmetric/linear in the short run. We conclude that unlike the linear models, the non-linear models provide realistic results by capturing hidden asymmetries, thereby assisting policymakers in useful decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available