4.6 Article

Does inflation instability affect environmental pollution? Fresh evidence from Asian economies

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 1275-1291

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0958305X20971804

Keywords

Inflation instability; CO2 emissions; Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS); Asian economies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the impact of inflation instability on environmental performance, finding that higher price volatility can improve environmental quality, while financial development stimulates pollution emissions and degrades the environment.
The present study examines the linkage between inflation instability and pollution emissions for the 40 Asian economies over the period of 1990-2018. However, a limited number of researches investigate the linkage between inflation instability and the environment. For empirical analysis, econometric methods namely cross-sectional test statistics for examining the dependency, cross-sectionally augmented Dickey-Fuller (CADF) and cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, and Shin (CIPS) for the panel unit root, Westerlund technique for the long-run relationship, and Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS) to estimate the long-run coefficients have adopted. Additionally, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin panel causality test is applied to investigate the causal nexus among the panel data series. The empirical finding depicts that inflation instability improves environmental performance implying that higher price volatility creates uncertainty that discourages investment projects and consumption, hence improves environmental quality. However, the results indicate that financial development stimulates pollution emissions and degrades environmental condition. Based on these findings, the study opens up innovative intuitions for policymakers to support a robust role of economic stability in attaining targets relevant to pollution reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available