4.4 Article

Supplemental irrigation to save water while growing cactus pear in semi-arid regions†

Journal

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 269-280

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2542

Keywords

fruit size distribution and growth; Opuntia spp; relative water content; soil water content; water productivity

Funding

  1. Fundacion Produce Zacatecas, AC [PFZ/075/2004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that supplemental irrigation can improve water use efficiency and yield of cactus pear under limited water conditions, making it a feasible irrigation strategy for agricultural production in areas with limited water resources.
Climate change will compromise food access by causing water shortages for agricultural purposes. Supplemental irrigation (SI) was explored for its effect on crop water use, fruit yield, water use efficiency, water productivity, mean fruit mass and fruit size distribution of four cactus pear cultivars. The irrigation treatments were: non-irrigated (NI) rainfed control, SI and full irrigation (FI). The cultivars were: 'Cristalina' (Opuntia albicarpa Scheinvar), 'Amarilla Olorosa' (O. spp.), 'Roja Lisa' (O. ficus-indica L. Mill.), and 'Dalia Roja' (O. spp.). The experiment was conducted in a split-block design. The SI treatment saved water, in a 3-year-average, by 52% for 'Cristalina', 51% for 'Roja Lisa' and 52% for both 'Amarilla Olorosa' and 'Dalia Roja'. This resulted in a reduction in crop water use by 38% for 'Cristalina', 42% for 'Roja Lisa', 39% for 'Amarilla Olorosa' and 40% for 'Dalia Roja'. For SI, plant-relative water content and fruit growth were similar to the FI plants. SI plants maintained fruit yield, mean fruit mass and marketable fruit size at the level of FI plants, while it improved efficiencies of water use and water productivity. SI is therefore a feasible irrigation strategy for cactus pear for those areas where water availability is limited for agricultural activities. (c) 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available