4.7 Article

Absence of αβ T cells accelerates disuse bone loss in male mice after spinal cord injury

Journal

ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Volume 1487, Issue 1, Pages 43-55

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14518

Keywords

T cells; immobilization; bone; spinal cord injury; unloading; RANKL; osteoprotegerin

Funding

  1. New York State Department of Health [C32093GG-3450000]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service [B2020C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mice with T cell deficiency, immobilization following spinal cord injury led to marked reduction in bone volume and more severe deterioration of bone structure compared to wild-type mice.
Whether T cells promote bone loss following immobilization after spinal cord injury (SCI) remains undetermined. Therefore, wild-type (WT) and T cell-deficient (Tcrb(-/-)) male mice underwent sham or contusion SCI to cause hindlimb paralysis. Femurs were isolated and distal and midshaft regions were evaluated by microcomputed tomography scanning. Bone marrow (BM) levels of bone turnover markers, as well as receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), were measured by ELISA. At 2 weeks post-SCI, immobilization resulted in marked reduction in trabecular fractional bone volume (55%), thickness (40%), connectivity, and cortical thickness only in the Tcrb(-/-) animals (interaction with P < 0.05). BM analysis revealed lower bone formation (procollagen type 1 intact N-terminal propeptide), higher bone resorption (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b), and a higher RANKL/OPG ratio in the Tcrb(-/-) SCI animals. At 5 weeks post-SCI, while both WT and Tcrb(-/-) paralyzed animals showed deterioration of all indices of bone structure, they were more severe in Tcrb(-/-) animals. In summary, unlike other skeletal disorders, loss of alpha beta T cells compromises, rather than preserves, skeletal integrity under conditions of immobilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available