4.2 Review

Bacterial pathogen detection by conventional culture-based and recent alternative (polymerase chain reaction, isothermal amplification, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, bacteriophage amplification, and gold nanoparticle aggregation) methods in food samples: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfs.12870

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of foodborne pathogens is crucial for ensuring food safety. Various alternative detection methods, such as polymerase chain reaction, isothermal amplification, bacteriophage amplification, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and gold nanoparticle aggregation, have been studied and discussed for their principles, advantages, and disadvantages in this review. Regulations related to bacterial pathogen detection in the United States and South Korea were also compared for their progress.
The rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of foodborne pathogens is important to ensure food safety. Culture medium-based methods for bacteria detection have long been used since Robert Koch's first finding. These methods are simple and cheap but have limitations, such as being time-consuming, labor-intensive, and having low selectivity. In this regard, several alternative detection methods have been reported. Among these, recent studies related to the application of polymerase chain reaction, isothermal amplification, bacteriophage amplification, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and gold nanoparticle aggregation for detection of pathogens in food are discussed in this review. The principles, advantages, and disadvantages of alternative methods are covered, including their rapidity, sensitivity, and selectivity. Finally, regulations related to bacterial pathogen detection in the United States and South Korea were compared with remarks for their progress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available