4.2 Article

Several QRPA method calculations of the Gamow-Teller strength distributions in 62-72Ge

Journal

INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Volume 95, Issue 10, Pages 2155-2167

Publisher

INDIAN ASSOC CULTIVATION SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12648-020-01878-1

Keywords

Gamow-Teller distribution; Germanium isotope; Sum B(GT); beta-Decay and electron capture

Funding

  1. Eskiehir Osmangazi universitesi (BAP Project) [2018-2117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of exotic nuclei, particularly in germanium isotopes, play a fundamental role in the dynamics of supernovae. The calculation of Gamow-Teller transitions using QRPA methods and the comparison with theoretical and experimental data provide valuable insights into the properties of GT in massive stars. This study contributes to a better understanding of the presupernova evolution of massive stars.
Studies of exotic nuclei are currently one of the most prolific in nuclear physics. Weak rates in germanium isotopes have a fundamental role in the dynamics of supernovae. Electron capture and beta-decay of germanium isotopes, specified by Gamow-Teller transitions, importantly modify the lepton fraction of the stellar matter. In this study, GamowTeller Transitions (GT) for Ge62-72 are calculated using QRPA methods. The GT strength distributions are calculated using eight different QRPA models. QRPA models, namely single quasi-particle (sqp), Pyatov method (PM) and the schematic model (SM), are further divided into four subcategories. Using these models, Gamow-Teller distribution, total GT strengths along electron capture direction (Sigma B(GT)(+)) and Ikeda sum rule are calculated. The results of sqp, PM, and SM are also compared with previous theoretical calculations and measured strength distributions wherever available. It is expected that this study of GT properties would gain favor and may help to a better understanding of the presupernova evolution of massive stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available