4.4 Article

An algorithm to correct for the CASSCF active space in multiscale QM/MM calculations based on geometry ensembles

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.26533

Keywords

active space; CASSCF; molecular dynamics; molecular orbital overlap matrix; QM; MM

Funding

  1. Consejeria de Educacion, Juventud y Deporte, Comunidad de Madrid [2018-T1/BMD-10261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An algorithm is proposed to evaluate molecular orbital overlap between different geometries to improve the accuracy of excitation energy calculations. Based on this algorithm, correct active space was recovered for 90% of the cases, enhancing computational efficiency.
When the excitation energies of an ensemble of geometries, computed by the complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) or other CAS-based methods, are convoluted to obtain the absorption spectrum, it is advisable that all the considered geometries have the same molecular orbitals within the active space. In this work, we present an algorithm that evaluates the molecular orbital overlap matrix between a previously selected reference geometry, with the desired active space, and each of the sampled geometries. Based on the value of the overlap matrix elements, the algorithm determines whether one or more pairs of molecular orbitals of the sampled geometry have to be swapped for a subsequent CASSCF calculation. We have applied the developed algorithm to CASSCF and CASPT2 calculations for sets of geometries of the five canonical nucleobases in vacuum and in aqueous solvent. The algorithm shows a very good efficacy since it recovered the correct active space for 90% of the geometries which presented undesired molecular orbitals in the active space after the first CASSCF wavefunction optimization. In addition, the importance of having the same orbitals within the active space for all the geometries is discussed based on the corrected and uncorrected density of states for the nucleobases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available