4.2 Article

Indigenous leadership in research in Australia

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 353-368

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2020.1843220

Keywords

Indigenous leadership; academic leadership; research impact; leadership practices; participatory research

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [IN150100011]
  2. Australian Research Council [IN150100011] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that Indigenous leadership in research refers to certain features, qualities, or processes that enable specific outcomes. Performance measures valued in academic research only reflect a part of leadership, hindering individuals who holistically pursue such a model from advancing.
Indigenous research leadership can enhance research benefits to Indigenous communities. Our research investigates how Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (henceforth Indigenous) leadership is expressed in the context of academic research, and how Indigenous leadership is supported or constrained in such context. This exploratory study includes semi-structured interviews with 20 Indigenous Australian researchers and document analysis. The thematic content analysis suggests that 'Indigenous leadership in research' refers to features, qualities or processes that enable certain outcomes, rather than formal ranking. Our research proposes a model connecting Indigenous leadership features in research with the achievement of (social) research impacts. The performance measures valued in academic research reflect a limited part of leadership as expressed by interviewees, hindering the achievement of higher hierarchical positions by those who holistically pursue such a leadership model. We suggest changes in the incentive structure and performance measures to better support Indigenous leadership in research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available