Journal
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 186, Issue 1, Pages 219-227Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06001-w
Keywords
Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4; 6 inhibitors; Abemaciclib; Interstitial lung disease; Pharmacovigilance; FAERS; Signal
Categories
Funding
- Alma Mater Studiorum Universita di Bologna within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study analyzed pulmonary toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitors using FAERS, finding increased reporting of ILD. Further population-based studies are needed to characterize the actual risk, emphasizing the importance of timely pharmacovigilance and clinicians' assessment of CDK4/6 inhibitors' potential responsibility in diagnosing lung injury.
Purpose We assessed pulmonary toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors by analyzing the publicly available FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods Reports of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were characterized in terms of demographic information, including daily dose, latency, concomitant drugs known to be associated with ILD, and causality assessment (adapted WHO system). Disproportionality analyses were carried out by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), accounting for major confounders, including notoriety and competition biases. Results ILD reports (N = 161) represented 2.1% and 0.3% of all reports for abemaciclib and palbocilcib/ribociclib, respectively, with negligible proportion of concomitant pneumotoxic drugs. Increased reporting was found for CDK4/6 inhibitors when compared to other drugs (ROR = 1.50; 95%CI = 1.28-1.74), and abemaciclib vs other anticancer agents (4.70; 3.62-5.98). Sensitivity analyses confirmed a strong and consistent disproportionality for abemaciclib. Higher-than-expected reporting emerged for palbociclib (1.38; 1.07-1.77) and ribociclib (2.39; 1.34-3.92) only when removing Japan reports. ILD occurred at recommended daily doses, with median latency ranging from 50 (abemaciclib) to 253 (ribociclib) days. Causality was highly probable in 55% of abemaciclib cases, probable in 68% of palbociclib cases. Conclusions Increased reporting of ILD with CDK4/6 inhibitors calls for further comparative population-based studies to characterize and quantify the actual risk, taking into account drug- and patient-related risk factors. These findings strengthen the role of (a) timely pharmacovigilance to detect post-marketing signals through FAERS and other real-world data, (b) clinicians to assess early, on a case-by-case basis, the potential responsibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors when diagnosing a lung injury.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available