4.4 Article

Oh the places they'll go: improving species distribution modelling for invasive forest pests in an uncertain world

Journal

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 297-349

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02372-9

Keywords

Forest invasive species; Species distribution models; Niche modelling; Asian gyspy moth; Asian longhorned beetle; Dutch elm disease; Sudden oak death

Funding

  1. Genome Canada
  2. Genome British Columbia
  3. Genome Quebec [10106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that ignoring the biological characteristics of invasive species and including biologically informed assumptions in SDM design can lead to the development of complex SDM models, which may not provide a complete picture of potential invasion scenarios.
Species distribution modelling (SDM) is a valuable tool for predicting the potential distribution of invasive species across space and time. Maximum entropy modelling (MaxEnt) is a popular choice for SDM, but questions have been raised about how these models are developed. Without biologically informed baseline assumptions, complex default SDM models could be selected, even though alternative settings may be more appropriate. Here we explored the effects of various SDM design strategies on distribution mapping of four forest invasive species (FIS) in Canada. We found that if we ignored the underlying FIS biology such as use of biologically relevant predictors, appropriate feature selection and inclusion of dispersal and biotic interactions when we developed our SDMs, we obtained complex SDMs (default) that provided an incomplete picture of the potential FIS invasion. We recommend simplifying SDM complexity and including biologically informed assumptions to achieve more accurate dispersal predictions, particularly when projecting FIS spread across time. We strongly encourage SDM users to perform speciesspecific tuning when modeling FIS distributions with MaxEnt to determine the best SDM design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available