4.4 Article

Comparison Between Two Solar Drying Techniques of Sewage Sludge: Draining Solar Drying and Drying Bed

Journal

WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 4089-4102

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12649-020-01293-x

Keywords

Sewage sludge; Draining greenhouse; Drying bed; Drying kinetics; Effective diffusivity; Natural and forced convection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The comparative study found that the draining greenhouse under forced convection may be the best technique for sludge drying. Drying curves of sludge varied in different seasons and environments, and choosing a suitable model can better describe the drying process.
A comparative study to the performances of the drying bed and the draining greenhouse was made in summer and winter. During each season, the first experience was conducted in the drying bed. The two other experiences were carried out in the draining greenhouse under natural and forced convection. The results show that in terms of drying time, the draining greenhouse under forced convection can be the best technique of sludge drying. For the drying curves, in the three cases of drying in summer and the case of drying bed in winter, only the decreasing speed phase (phase 2) is present. However, in both cases of drying in the draining greenhouse in winter, the curves did not follow any regular shape. Twelve models were tested to fit the drying kinetics of the sludge. For all experiences, Midilli-Kucuk model was chosen as the best model. The values of the effective diffusivity varied between 5.76 x 10(-10) and 8.51 x 10(-10) in summer and between 1.77 x 10(-10) and 3.36 x 10(-10) in winter. [GRAPHICS]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available