4.1 Article

Clinical, Socio-economic and Environmental Factors Related with Recurrences in Ocular Toxoplasmosis in Quindio, Colombia

Journal

OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 258-264

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2020.1839509

Keywords

Ocular toxoplasmosis; Retinochoroiditis; Toxoplasma gondii; risk factors; boiled water

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that low socioeconomic level was associated with bigger lesions, congenital infection was related with higher frequency of bilateral OT, and intake of boiled water was related to a lower recurrence index of OT.
Purpose To identify the sociodemographic, clinical, and environmental factors associated with recurrences in ocular toxoplasmosis (OT). Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical records of patients who consulted in the Health Centre at Universidad del Quindio between 2004 and 2017. Patients with retinochoroiditis due to Toxoplasma gondii infection and follow up >12 months were included. Comparisons were made with a recurrence index adjusted for months of follow up. For the statistical analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were performed in Epi Info 7.2 and SPSS 14.0. A statistical significance is shown if p <= 0.05. Results A total of 58 patients were included, with median age of 28 years (range 1-61) and 55.1% were women. The median of recurrences was 1.4 (range 0.6-16.6). High recurrence index was present in 43.1% of the patients. A higher size of lesions was observed in low socioeconomic groups (p = .016) and patients with congenital infection had more bilateral compromise (p = .002). Intake of boiled water was related to a lower recurrence index (p = .04). Conclusions Low socioeconomic level was associated with bigger lesions and congenital infection was related with higher frequency of bilateral OT. Finally, intake of boiled water is related to a lower recurrence index of OT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available