4.2 Article

Description of new Permian orthocerid forms from Gufeng Formation of South China (the Yangtze Craton) and their palaeobiogeographic implications in the Palaeotethys

Journal

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages 2804-2821

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2020.1830277

Keywords

Gufeng Formation; Guadalupian; Anhui province; Pseudorthoceratidae; bacterial colonies; Palaeotethys

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Project [XDB26000000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orthocerids fossils from the Upper Gufeng Formation in Anhui Province, China, are described for the first time in this article. A new genus and species have been identified, with around 17% of the specimens showing epibiotic bacterial colonies. These fossils are interpreted as organisms that lived in shallow marine waters, near the sediment surface or close to the sea bottom on the eastern margin of the Palaeotethys Ocean during a faunal crisis in the late Guadalupian period.
Orthocerids from the Upper Gufeng Formation, Guadalupian (middle Permian), from Anhui Province (China) are described for the first time in this article. The specimens are mainly Pseudorthoceratidae characterised by slender orthocones that have been studied under CT-Scan. A new genus and species have been described, Houdongoceras chaohuensis gen. et sp. nov., with seven morphotypes that presumably relate to new ones. Seventeen per cent of the specimens have epibiotic bacterial colonies associated indicating suboxic environments restating redox conditions during their deposition. This is also the first report of Permian macrofossils presenting bacterial colonies in China. This fauna is interpreted as autochthonous or parautochthonous which originally lived nektobenthically in shallow marine waters above the sediments or close to the sea bottom on the eastern margin of the Palaeotethys Ocean during the late Guadalupian faunal crisis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available