4.4 Review

Efficacy of varicocelectomy for sperm DNA integrity improvement: A meta-analysis

Journal

ANDROLOGIA
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/and.13885

Keywords

DNA fragmentation; meta‐ analysis; spermatozoa; varicocele; varicocelectomy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of varicocelectomy for sperm DNA integrity, with results showing a significant improvement in sperm DNA integrity among clinical varicocele patients following the surgery.
Varicocele is common among male adolescents and adults. Varicocelectomy is the major means of varicocele repair. There is evidence that varicocelectomy could decrease sperm DNA fragmentation. However, studies evaluating the efficacy of varicocelectomy for sperm DNA integrity usually have a small sample size, and there is no up-to-date meta-analysis in this area. The present meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of varicocelectomy for sperm DNA integrity. A literature search was conducted to identify all relevant studies from Medline database (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and OVID Embase from the inception dates to 08 June 2020. A total of 11 prospective studies including 394 cases were included in this meta-analysis. All analysis was performed using Stata version 16.0. In the random-effect model for 11 studies, DNA fragmentation index (%) of clinical varicocele patients decreased by 5.79 (95% CI, -7.39 to -4.19) after varicocelectomy. While after excluding one study with high heterogeneity, from the results of fixed-effect model, DNA fragmentation index decreased by 6.14 (95% CI, -6.90 to -5.37) on average. Sperm DNA integrity of clinical varicocele patients was significantly improved following varicocelectomy. Therefore, it is necessary to include elevated sperm DNA fragmentation index as a molecular indicator for varicocelectomy among clinical varicocele cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available