4.7 Article

Predictors of carbon emissions: an empirical evidence from NAFTA countries

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 11205-11223

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11197-x

Keywords

Predictors; Carbon emissions; Economic growth; Foreign direct investments; Population growth; CCEMG regression estimator; NAFTA countries

Funding

  1. Nature Fund 2020 [71973054]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the predictors of carbon emissions in member countries of the NAFTA using panel models and found that GDP is a significant positive predictor of CO2 emissions, while FDI and population growth have trivial effects. The findings varied among individual countries, and there was no causality between GDP and CO2 emissions, nor between population growth and CO2 emissions.
This study examined the predictors of carbon emissions in member countries of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity were used for the study. From the heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence tests, the studied panel was heterogeneous and cross-sectionally dependent. Also, the unit root and cointegration tests established the series to be first differenced stationary and cointegrated in the long run. Additionally, results of the CCEMG regression estimator in the whole panel affirmed economic growth (GDP) to be a significantly positive predictor of CO2 emissions, while foreign direct investments (FDI) and population growth (POP) were trivial determinants of CO2 emissions. The discoveries were however diverse in the individual countries. Finally, there was no causality between GDP and CO2 emissions and between POP and CO2 emissions. However, there was a one-way causality from CO2 emissions to FDI. Policy recommendations are further discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available